Free tool for candidates

Free AI mock interview.

Five questions written for the role you are actually applying for, answered in your own words, scored one at a time with the reasoning shown. No account, no email, about ten minutes.

Free. No account. Five questions.

Getting something out of it

Practising the right thing.

Almost nobody fails a first-round interview by getting a fact wrong. They fail by answering in general terms — describing how they would approach a problem rather than a time they did, or claiming an outcome without saying what they personally changed to produce it. That is what this is looking for, and it is the thing that most reliably improves with one afternoon of practice.

So answer as if you were speaking. One example, named. What the situation was, what you did, what happened, and what you would do differently. If an answer takes you three sentences, it is probably too abstract to be persuasive out loud.

Paste the real job description if you have it. The questions get noticeably more specific, and specific questions are the ones worth rehearsing.

Questions about AI interview practice

Which AI is best for interview preparation?
It depends what you are practising. For open-ended rehearsal and follow-up questions, a general assistant like Claude or ChatGPT is genuinely good and costs nothing. A dedicated tool like this one is more useful when you want the same structure a real screening round uses: a fixed set of role-specific questions, answered under something like real conditions, and scored against them rather than chatted about.
Is this AI mock interview really free?
Yes, with no account and no email wall. We make hiring software for employers, and the same question-generation and scoring that runs their interviews runs this. There is a limit on how many you can take in an hour, which is there to stop scripts rather than people.
How should I use a mock interview?
Answer as if you were speaking, not writing — full sentences, one specific example, roughly ninety seconds' worth. The most common finding is not a wrong answer but a vague one: a claim about what you generally do rather than a story about one time you did it. Do it twice, a day apart, and change one thing.
Do I type or speak my answers?
Type, here. The full product records and transcribes spoken answers, but that needs a session and storage that an anonymous visitor does not get, and a half-working recorder would be worse than an honest text box. Write what you would say out loud and the feedback still holds.
Is the feedback any good?
It is good at what models are good at: noticing that an answer never got specific, that a question was not actually addressed, or that a claim arrived with no evidence. It is not a prediction of whether you will get the job, and you should ignore the number if the written feedback tells you something more useful.
Do you keep my answers?
No. There is no account to attach them to, and nothing you write here reaches an employer or a candidate database.

Keep reading